I was a little stunned to read about the Amethyst Initiative, a quest by university and college chancellors and presidents to legally reduce the drinking age from 21 to 18.
They have signed their names to a public statement to this effect and are calling for elected leaders to back them up. They believe that lowering the drinking age to 18 will cut down on the number of binge drinking incidents at college campuses across the United States.
I'm calling on our elected leaders to use common sense here.
Their public declaration is that a "culture of dangerous, clandestine “binge-drinking”—often conducted off-campus—has developed" across University and college campuses today.
And they believe that those who are old enough to vote, join the military and serve on juries should also be old enough to purchase a beer legally.
It sounds to me as if our esteemed college and university presidents and chancellors need to leave their offices and come down the steps and into the lives of the students that they think they're trying to represent. And perhaps they should consider spending a single Friday with a parent from any given high school. Friday nights are party nights. That's when the students are ready for the weekend.
I'm speaking in general terms, not of my daughters, specifically. I've been around enough teenagers to know these things.
My daughter attends a fairly average high school in Florida which mixes all ages and all grades together in various courses. Therefore, in her chemistry course, she is just as likely to share the class with the 18- year- old senior who hasn't yet graduated as she is with the 14- year-old freshman who is just starting high school for the first time ever.
And the interaction between the 14 and 18 yr. old set would give any parent nightmares if they heard the type of parties being planned on any given weekend.
Or if they heard the sex talk that goes on between the students.
You think they talk about chemistry non-stop?
If the initiative passes, that 18 year old, now allowed to drink legally for the first time, is not likely to exclude the cute little 15 year old sophomore who wants to attend his party Friday night. The 14 year old freshman? She can come if she doesn't tell anyone about the alcohol. Armed with the ability to buy all the Mountain Dew and Vodka he wants, he's going to be the most popular kid on campus.
I, and many of my friends, have enough problems with parents who willingly allow their 16 year old to drive simply because it's convenient for the parent, whether or not the kid is mature enough to know how to handle herself on the road in a high traffic situation.
The thought of the same type of parent simply shrugging, and saying "Well? what can I do? It's legal for them to drink!" - is giving me headaches.
This initiative is going to create a whole other set of problems for high school administrators, especially in an era where, because of budget cuts, high school counselors are few and far between. You won't find a plentiful supply of counselors in any given Florida public school, because there isn't enough money to pay them. You will find very little alcohol counseling as well.
It seems to me the university presidents are simply sick of babysitting, and of spending good money on security for their campus police departments, who otherwise would have to police these binge drinking parties.
And I can't shake the feeling they're more concerned about their financial liability than about the safety of their students.
The student who is old enough to vote or sit on a jury is not endangering his life by doing so. Maturity plays a huge part in this situation. Does he or she also have the maturity to drink that beer, and the 6 pack of beers that follow it, and then know when to turn over the keys to a designated driver?
Really? You think most of them know when to say when?
Then take a look at this article which still churns my stomach to this day.
In addition, The Tampa Bay region has the the highest fatality rate of teen drivers in the nation. Adding alcohol to the mix is a recipe for disaster.
I would like the Initiative group to read the bottom of this article, published in September, 2007.
"By now, the names of the young dead are stacking up: 14-year-old Raquel Carreras of St. Petersburg died Sept. 15 after a car loaded with five others under 15 lost control; 17-year-old Matthew Laidley of Wesley Chapel died on Aug. 29, his two friends seriously injured; 17-year-old driver Tyler Clark of Valrico died Oct. 8 after his Jeep carrying seven others bumped a median and spun out of control, injuring the others.
Other names and dates in recent memory:
- Oct. 13: Charlotte Marie Hoffman's Ford Mustang flew off a curve, hit a tree and broke in two pieces, killing Callie Lynn Roberts, her 16-year-old passenger. Hoffman of Ruskin was 18.
- Oct. 18: Andrew Leight, 16, driving his father's truck in Gibsonton, clipped 15-year-old Fredrick Gardner's bike, killing Fredrick.
- Feb. 27: Lindsey Rutledge, 16, died in Valrico after she stepped into the path of a car driven by Zachary Carroll, 16. No charges have been filed.
And Hulk Hogan's 17-year-old son, Nick Bollea, is in the center of a high-profile case as Clearwater police investigate his Aug. 26 collision, which critically injured his passenger, 22-year-old John Graziano.
An estimated 702 crashes occur on Florida roads every day, most frequently involving drivers 15 to 19.
Stephen Hegarty, spokesman for Hillsborough County schools, said the problem has become so urgent that superintendent MaryEllen Elia has made it a part of town hall meetings. She has one at 7 tonight at Jefferson High School.
Elia frequently requests that officers station themselves around campuses to police teen drivers, Hegarty said.
"We have had too many tragedies," he said. "All you can do is stress it over and over again."
The Amethyst Initiative purports that if teenagers were legally allowed to buy alcohol, they would be less likely to binge on it. I don't buy that line of thinking at all.
Teens don't drink because it's illegal or because they're going to get away with it. They drink for the same reason you and I do, because alcohol makes you feel good. It helps you relax when you're at a party with your friends. You're more likely to loosen up and get into party mode when you've had a few beers or margaritas.
We all know that if a student wants to, he or she will find a way to drink. Studies show that 81% of high school students have tried alcohol before graduation. But making it legal for the 18 year old to buy liquor would allow them to legally bring alcohol to a party where there are likely to be many 15, 16, 17 year old students on the scene. And that just gives me chills.
Pass this initiative, and watch those kids get in the car afterward and drive off.
It's just not the phone call any of us wants to get in the middle of the night.
And I find it deplorable that any university president would agree to this Initiative without thinking it through.
Possible Solutions:
A Harvard University study on binge drinking showed that underage students attending colleges in states with extensive laws restricting underage and high-volume drinking were less likely to binge on alcohol.
The study goes on to show that an established culture of binge drinking already in place by the colleges encourages them to drink more.
I would suggest lowering it to age 20. How about that? By then, they're usually out of high school and hopefully have moved away from socializing with the the 14 - 17 yr. old set.
Additionally, the MySpace and Facebook generation needs to wake up and solve this problem themselves.
I would like to know, what is the appeal of a binge anyway?
And do you know how to stop yourself in time? Would your friends stop you from reaching that point?
There are those who point to history, and remind everyone of the binge drinking that took place in the 60's or 70's before the age limit was imposed.
I'd then wonder if the university presidents are not simply trying to absolve themselves of current litigation brought on by the parents of the students who died from this type of thing.
I don't know what the answer is. I do commend the Initiative for provoking a national debate on the subject.
But lowering the drinking age to 18 is not the answer.
To our elected officials, don't pass this initiative. It will create more problems than it solves.
What do you think? I'd like to know your thoughts, both pros and cons.



















Recent Comments